Understanding Unconditional Election: Addressing the Objection of Unfairness
One of the most common objections to the doctrine of unconditional election is that it seems unfair for God to choose to save some individuals while passing over others. This concern is rooted in our natural sense of justice and equality. However, as we delve into the Scriptures, we find that God’s sovereignty and mercy are not limited by our finite understanding of fairness.
Paul’s Response to the Objection
In Romans 9:14-18, Paul directly addresses the objection of unfairness. He anticipates that some might argue that God is unjust to choose to save only certain individuals, while leaving others to their own devices. However, Paul asserts that God’s sovereignty is not bound by human notions of fairness. He quotes Exodus 33:19, where God says, “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.” This verse highlights God’s freedom to show mercy and compassion to whomever He chooses.
The Parable of the Laborers
Jesus’ parable of the laborers in the vineyard (Matthew 20:1-16) provides further insight into God’s sovereignty and mercy. In this parable, the master of the house hires laborers at different times of the day, but pays them all the same wage. The laborers who worked longer hours grumble at the master’s generosity, feeling that it is unfair to pay the later workers the same amount. However, the master responds, “Am I not allowed to do what I choose with what belongs to me? Or do you begrudge my generosity?” This parable illustrates that God’s mercy and generosity are not limited by human notions of fairness or deserving.
God’s Sovereignty and Mercy
God’s sovereignty and mercy are two sides of the same coin. His sovereignty means that He has the right to do whatever He wants with His creatures. His mercy means that He chooses to show kindness and compassion to those who do not deserve it. As the Psalmist writes, “All his ways are justice” (Deuteronomy 32:4). God’s justice is not limited by human notions of fairness, but rather it is rooted in His character and sovereignty.
Conclusion
The doctrine of unconditional election may seem unfair to us, but it is rooted in God’s sovereignty and mercy. God’s choice to save some individuals while passing over others is not limited by human notions of fairness or deserving. Rather, it is a demonstration of His mercy and generosity. As we grapple with this doctrine, we must remember that God’s ways are not our ways, and His thoughts are not our thoughts. We can trust in His sovereignty and mercy, knowing that He is always just and fair, even when we do not understand His ways.
Leave a Reply