Navigating Political Disagreements within the Church
As the world becomes increasingly polarized, Christians are faced with a daunting challenge: how to maintain unity amidst political disagreements within the church. In this thought-provoking discussion, Jonathan Leeman sheds light on the importance of distinguishing between clear biblical principles and prudential applications of those principles.
The Polarized Landscape
Leeman acknowledges that the current political climate is indeed more divisive than ever, citing declining civil trust and increased partisanship. He attributes this shift to various factors, including the decline of intermingling among politicians and the rise of social media, which exacerbates division and fosters echo chambers.
The Importance of Relationships
Leeman emphasizes the significance of building genuine relationships across political lines, highlighting the contrast between the past, when politicians from different parties would socialize and build trust, and the present, where social media platforms are ill-equipped to facilitate meaningful connections.
Disagreement vs. Division
Leeman notes that Christians often agree on core principles, such as the wrongness of racism, but disagree on policy decisions based on those principles. He stresses the importance of recognizing this distinction to prevent losing sight of the foundational agreement on principles. By doing so, Christians can avoid allowing policy disagreements to create unnecessary divisions within the church.
Principles vs. Applications
Leeman illustrates this dynamic using the example of racism, where Christians may agree on the principle but disagree on the policy response, such as racial reparations. He cautions against conflating disagreement on applications with a lack of understanding of the gospel, emphasizing the need to separate biblical principles from prudential judgments.
Unity Amidst Diversity
Ultimately, Leeman encourages Christians to prioritize the gospel’s unifying power, recognizing that unity is not uniformity, but rather the ability to engage with those who disagree on political issues. By doing so, the church can model a distinctively Christian approach to political disagreements, one that values both conviction and charity.
Leave a Reply